This just in (1-25-13) — an actual survey of physicists attending the conference “Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality," held July 3-7, 2011, at the International Academy Traunkirchen, Austria. A survey asking them how they interpreted quantum mechanics. Very revealing even though only 33 (of 35 attendees) physicists are polled. I have the pdf here.
Just discovered this elegant French site.
This is their take on the double slit experiment. (Look right on the page.) Notice that it, accurately, represents the particles involved (electron or photon etc.) only as particles when they are in fact observed. At other times they are represented as the famous waves of probability that get collapsed when an observation is made.
The standard or Copenhagen interpretation is that the waves are not material, they are just a mathematical function representing the probability that if you did perform an observation somewhere, the electron would be there. “Born realized the waves are not material as Shrödinger wrongly supposed; they are waves of probability, rather like actuarial statistics….” (Pagels, Cosmic Code, 80, his emphasis.) One thing this means is that while the eye will see an electron every time it looks (except when it happens to be behind it, I guess), the electron won’t always be going through one or the other slits. QM is a statistical science that can still blow your socks off.
Here is an exhibit on Werner Heisenberg and QM created by The American Institute of Physics and David Cassady at Hofstra University. It is quite historical, done by physicists looking at exactly what who said when. It also has lots of background info. And it is directed at the thoughtful layman as well as the professional physicist. I enjoyed this conversation between the young Heisenberg and the prime of life Einstein, as recalled by Heisenberg. Einstein objects to something Heisenberg is doing in this QM effort, and H objects that E did the same thing in his Relativity Theory. Then:
"Possibly I did use this kind of reasoning," Einstein admitted, "but it is nonsense all the same....In reality the very opposite happens. It is the theory which decides what we can observe."
Recently (published March 2013) and in fact for the very first time, the double slit experiment has been performed in the lab in exactly the manner everyone talks about it over on the left. Here is the very readable scientific article as published.